{"id":1637,"date":"2024-10-31T16:41:08","date_gmt":"2024-10-31T21:41:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/?page_id=1637"},"modified":"2024-11-08T13:28:48","modified_gmt":"2024-11-08T18:28:48","slug":"2nd-marine-logistics-group-headquarters","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/?page_id=1637","title":{"rendered":"2nd Marine Logistics Group Headquarters"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

2nd<\/sup> Marine Logistics Group Headquarters
Project Location: Camp Lejeune, North Carolina\u00a0\u00a0
Owner: Department of the Navy\u00a0
Architectural Firm: STANTEC Architecture, Inc.\u00a0
Rating system: ASHRAE 90.1-2013\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0
Gross floor area: 35,000 GSF
Project type: Office<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a>
Courtesy of STANTEC Architecture, Inc.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Climatic Design, LLC developed a whole-building energy model simulation, a comprehensive energy analysis for the 2nd<\/sup> Marine Logistics Group Headquarters (MLG). Simulation results of the Baseline Case and the Proposed Design models demonstrate that annual energy costs of the proposed design is 31.2% lower than the ASHRAE 90.1-2013 reference model and the site energy use intensity (EUI) of the proposed design would be 21.9 KBTU\/sf-yr. Per UFC 1-200-02 Section 2-3.1.1, percentage improvement of the proposed model over the ASHRAE 90.1-2013 baseline is 33.6% (Section 2.B.3).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a>
Rendering of the Proposed Model demonstrating different glazing types South East view<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a>
Rendering of the Baseline Reference Model with the original orientation, North East view<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a>
Rendering of the Baseline Reference Model, North West view<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a>
Annual Energy Consumption by Endues \u2013 Proposed Design and Baseline Case<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

UFC 1-200-02 REQUIREMENT<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

UFC 1-200-02 requires when using ASHRAE 90.1-2013, energy consumption levels for both the ASHRAE Baseline Building and proposed building alternatives should be determined by using the Performance Rating Method found in Appendix G of ASHRAE 90.1, except for the formula for calculating the Performance Rating, which should be replaced by the following formula:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Percentage improvement = 100 \u00d7 ((Baseline building consumption \u2212 Receptacle and process loads) \u2212 (Proposed building consumption \u2212 Receptacle and process loads)) \/ (Baseline building consumption \u2212 Receptacle and process loads)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Where:
Baseline building consumption = 1,035.6 MBTU
Receptacle and process loads = 259.4 MBTU
Proposed building consumption = 774.4 MBTU
Percentage improvement = 100 \u00d7 ((1,035.6 \u2013 259.4) \u2212 (774.4 \u2013 259.4)) \/ (1,035.6 \u2013 259.4)
\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 = 100 x (776.2 \u2013 515) \/ 776.2
\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 = 100 x (261.2 \/ 776.2)
\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 = 100 x 0.336
Percentage improvement = 33.6%\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

2nd Marine Logistics Group HeadquartersProject Location: Camp Lejeune, North Carolina\u00a0\u00a0Owner: Department of the Navy\u00a0Architectural Firm: STANTEC Architecture, Inc.\u00a0Rating system: ASHRAE 90.1-2013\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0Gross floor area: 35,000 GSF Project type: Office Climatic Design, LLC developed a whole-building energy model simulation, a comprehensive energy analysis for the 2nd Marine Logistics Group Headquarters (MLG). Simulation results of the Baseline […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-1637","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1637"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1637"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1637\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1841,"href":"https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1637\/revisions\/1841"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1637"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}