{"id":1731,"date":"2024-11-04T18:18:55","date_gmt":"2024-11-04T23:18:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/?page_id=1731"},"modified":"2024-11-08T14:49:14","modified_gmt":"2024-11-08T19:49:14","slug":"the-avondale","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/?page_id=1731","title":{"rendered":"The Avondale"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Project Location: Bethesda Maryland<br>Client: SJ Investment Corp<br>Architectural Firm: Perkins Eastman Architects, DPC<br>Rating system and goal: IgCC Performance Path &#8211; zEPI Score of 43<br>Gross floor area: 53,000<br>Project type: Multi-unit Residential<br>Certification: TBD<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"http:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-31.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"938\" height=\"1024\" src=\"http:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-31-938x1024.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1732\" style=\"width:795px;height:auto\" srcset=\"https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-31-938x1024.png 938w, https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-31-275x300.png 275w, https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-31-768x838.png 768w, https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-31.png 975w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 938px) 100vw, 938px\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><sup>Courtesy of Perkins Eastman Architects, DPC<\/sup><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Climatic Design, LLC prepared a whole-building energy model and preliminary energy analysis for The Avondale. The effort of this energy model was to meet Performance-based compliance of IgCC-2015 and demonstrate zEPI of 43 or less and the required CO\u2082\u0435 pdp for a new multifamily building. Multiple Energy Conservation Measures (ECMs) were modeled to identify most suitable design decisions. With the execution of the recommended ECMs, the proposed design would meet Minimum Energy Performance required by IgCC\/ASHRAE energy modeling protocol. The facility would be approximately 20% more energy efficient than the ASHRAE 90.1-2016 reference model with zEPI of 41.6. In addition, CO\u2082 emission of the proposed model is much lower than the baseline reference model.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><a href=\"http:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-32.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"975\" height=\"465\" src=\"http:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-32.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1733\" srcset=\"https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-32.png 975w, https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-32-300x143.png 300w, https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-32-768x366.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 975px) 100vw, 975px\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><sup>Rendering of the Baseline Reference Model, North West view<\/sup><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><a href=\"http:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-33.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"975\" height=\"570\" src=\"http:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-33.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1734\" srcset=\"https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-33.png 975w, https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-33-300x175.png 300w, https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-33-768x449.png 768w, https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-33-580x340.png 580w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 975px) 100vw, 975px\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><sup>Rendering of the Baseline Reference Model with the original orientation, South West view<\/sup><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><a href=\"http:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-34.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"916\" height=\"610\" src=\"http:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-34.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1735\" srcset=\"https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-34.png 916w, https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-34-300x200.png 300w, https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-34-768x511.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 916px) 100vw, 916px\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><sup>Rendering of the Baseline Reference Model, North East view<\/sup><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><a href=\"http:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-35.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"883\" height=\"486\" src=\"http:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-35.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1736\" srcset=\"https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-35.png 883w, https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-35-300x165.png 300w, https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-35-768x423.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 883px) 100vw, 883px\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><sup>Rendering of the Proposed Model, Aerial view from South East<\/sup><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><a href=\"http:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-36.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"975\" height=\"740\" src=\"http:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-36.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1737\" srcset=\"https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-36.png 975w, https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-36-300x228.png 300w, https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-36-768x583.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 975px) 100vw, 975px\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><sup>Annual Energy Consumption by Endues \u2013 Proposed Design and Baseline Case<\/sup><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><a href=\"http:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-67.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"975\" height=\"520\" src=\"http:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-67.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1853\" srcset=\"https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-67.png 975w, https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-67-300x160.png 300w, https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-67-768x410.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 975px) 100vw, 975px\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>*Site Electricity x 3.28 + Site N-Gas x 1.09<br><br>** (zEPI x CO\u2082\u1d49 bbp)\/52<br>Multiplier per IgCC-2013: 52<br>zEPI = 52 x (Pbp\/Bbp)<br>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Energy Conversion Factor for Electricity Maryland &#8211; FRCE: 3.28<br>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Fossil Fuel Energy Conversion Factor &#8211; Natural Gas: 1.09<br>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Fossil Fuel Emission Factor &#8211; Natural Gas: 141<br>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 CO\u2082\u1d49 Rate (Kg\/KWh) RFC East: 0.543-\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<br>CO\u2082\u1d49 bbp = Site Electricity usage x 0.543 + Site Natural Gas usage x 141<br>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 = 355,573 x 0.543 + 1,214 x 141 = 357,337 <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>***CO\u2082\u1d49 Index = (zEPI x CO\u2082\u1d49bbp)\/52<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Project Location: Bethesda MarylandClient: SJ Investment CorpArchitectural Firm: Perkins Eastman Architects, DPCRating system and goal: IgCC Performance Path &#8211; zEPI Score of 43Gross floor area: 53,000Project type: Multi-unit ResidentialCertification: TBD Climatic Design, LLC prepared a whole-building energy model and preliminary energy analysis for The Avondale. The effort of this energy model was to meet Performance-based [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-1731","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1731"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1731"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1731\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1854,"href":"https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1731\/revisions\/1854"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1731"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}