{"id":1773,"date":"2024-11-06T17:36:12","date_gmt":"2024-11-06T22:36:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/?page_id=1773"},"modified":"2024-11-06T17:51:20","modified_gmt":"2024-11-06T22:51:20","slug":"patterson-park-public-charter-school","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/?page_id=1773","title":{"rendered":"Patterson Park Public Charter School"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Patterson Park Public Charter School (PPPC-School)<br>Project Location: Baltimore, Maryland<br>Owner: Patterson Park Public Charter School<br>Architecture Firm: trace Architects<br>Rating system: BCGBS\/LEED-NC 2009 &nbsp;<br>Gross floor area: 10,000 GSF<br>Building type:&nbsp; School<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><a href=\"http:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-51.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"752\" height=\"567\" src=\"http:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-51.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1774\" srcset=\"https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-51.png 752w, https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-51-300x226.png 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 752px) 100vw, 752px\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Climatic Design LLC has performed a whole-building energy model simulation, a comprehensive energy analysis, and an assessment of the building systems and configuration for this project. The intention of this energy analysis was to demonstrate energy performance of the proposed design compared to the ASHRAE 90.1-2007 reference model and to determine most suitable Energy Conservation Measures (ECMs) to achieve more LEED points. Simulation results demonstrated that the proposed design will meet the LEED-NC 2009 Minimum Energy Performance requirement. The project is 15.3% more efficient than the ASHRAE 90.1- 2007 Baseline Case, which equates to (2) EAc1 points and complies with the Baltimore City Green Building Standards (BCGBS). In addition, with the execution of the recommended ECMs it is possible to increase the energy saving of the assembly to 28%, which equates to (9) LEED-NC 2009 points.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><a href=\"http:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-52.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"969\" height=\"519\" src=\"http:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-52.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1775\" srcset=\"https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-52.png 969w, https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-52-300x161.png 300w, https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-52-768x411.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 969px) 100vw, 969px\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><sup>Rendering of the Baseline Case with the original orientation<\/sup><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><a href=\"http:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-53.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"975\" height=\"515\" src=\"http:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-53.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1776\" srcset=\"https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-53.png 975w, https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-53-300x158.png 300w, https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-53-768x406.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 975px) 100vw, 975px\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><sup>Rendering of the Baseline Case with 270 degree rotation<\/sup><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><a href=\"http:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-54.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"900\" height=\"472\" src=\"http:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-54.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1777\" srcset=\"https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-54.png 900w, https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-54-300x157.png 300w, https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-54-768x403.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 900px) 100vw, 900px\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><sup>Rendering of the Propose Design, Northeast view<\/sup><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Based on the simulation results, implementation of following ECMs recommended in in priority order:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>ECM-3: Control interior lighting of all spaces with windows.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>ECM-1: Reduce internal lighting power density by a minimum of 20% from the ASHRAE Standard.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>ECM-2: Install automatic light controls in all activity areas.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><a href=\"http:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-55.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"975\" height=\"379\" src=\"http:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-55.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1778\" srcset=\"https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-55.png 975w, https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-55-300x117.png 300w, https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-55-768x299.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 975px) 100vw, 975px\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><a href=\"http:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-56.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"761\" height=\"472\" src=\"http:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-56.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1782\" srcset=\"https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-56.png 761w, https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/image-56-300x186.png 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 761px) 100vw, 761px\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><sup>Energy Cost Savings of the Proposed Design Relative to Baseline Case (%)<\/sup><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Patterson Park Public Charter School (PPPC-School)Project Location: Baltimore, MarylandOwner: Patterson Park Public Charter SchoolArchitecture Firm: trace ArchitectsRating system: BCGBS\/LEED-NC 2009 &nbsp;Gross floor area: 10,000 GSFBuilding type:&nbsp; School Climatic Design LLC has performed a whole-building energy model simulation, a comprehensive energy analysis, and an assessment of the building systems and configuration for this project. The intention [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-1773","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1773"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1773"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1773\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1785,"href":"https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1773\/revisions\/1785"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climaticdesign.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1773"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}